Page 2 of 6

Re: CMSimple is now released under GPL 3

Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 7:46 am
by Holger
leenm wrote:It's bets to stay with the name.
+1

Holger

Re: CMSimple is now released under GPL 3

Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:31 am
by johnjdoe
leenm wrote:
Tata wrote:I also think that keeping the "XH" is best corresponding to CMSimple_XH. It may be confusing to have different names for a website and for the software. Hm?
I agree. The name of the successor of CMSimple is CMSimple_XH. It's confusing if you have a website cmsimple-xh.de and cmsimple.eu. It's best to stay with the name.
Yeap, that's my opinion too!

Re: CMSimple is now released under GPL 3

Posted: Wed Jan 06, 2010 9:55 pm
by Ikko
OK, than "cmsimpleforum.com" should be renamed "cmsimpleXHforum.com"...

Re: CMSimple is now released under GPL 3

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 11:54 am
by wosee
I don't really get it, why won't you just rename CMSimple_XH to CMSimple 3.4 and carry on development, as Peter said
...and future development has to be carried on by others...
I think he meant you.

Don't get me wrong, but imho CMSimple_XH is a very confusing name and even looks stupid. I appreciate your work a lot, what you do is awesome, but I'd like to see CMSimple being developed rather than CMSimple_XH.

Well, it's up to you.

Re: CMSimple is now released under GPL 3

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:27 pm
by Gert
Hi wosee,

as we was beginning, CMSimple 3.4 was not possible under Peters license conditions. Now the baby is born.

I think, CMSimple_XH is an logical name, because you can setup Websites in Xhtml or html, and it's ready for html 5, but the Editors dont't produce html5-conforming content at the moment,

Gert

Re: CMSimple is now released under GPL 3

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 2:39 pm
by wosee
I know, but now it is possible, am I right? Why should CMSimple 3.4 not have this "bugfix"? I don't think that valid code is that important to be mentioned it in the name of the project. Valid code is a standard, or at least it should be!

The valid plugins could be contributed with these XH thing, to show that they generate valid code!

Re: CMSimple is now released under GPL 3

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 3:02 pm
by leenm
wosee wrote:Don't get me wrong, but imho CMSimple_XH is a very confusing name and even looks stupid. I appreciate your work a lot, what you do is awesome, but I'd like to see CMSimple being developed rather than CMSimple_XH.
I don't think CMSimple_XH is a stupid name, but that's personal. As CMSimple_XH developer, I wouldn't mind to change the name back to CMSimple.
Gert wrote:as we was beginning, CMSimple 3.4 was not possible under Peters license conditions. Now the baby is born.
So now it's possible (?)
wosee wrote:I don't think that valid code is that important to be mentioned it in the name of the project. Valid code is a standard, or at least it should be!
The valid plugins could be contributed with these XH thing, to show that they generate valid code!
+1

But I don't think this is going to happen, because all developers have to agree with this. Also there's something to say for the new name (CMSimple_XH), so I won't mind which name it is, as long as it isn't confusing for anyone. That's most important for me.

Leen

Re: CMSimple is now released under GPL 3

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 3:10 pm
by Gert
leenm wrote:So now it's possible (?)
I don't know, and I don't want ;)

And now @ all:

We have discussed some names by beginning, and the most wanted name for the baby was ..._XH. Now the domain is paid, the Google ranking is good, and I think cmsimple-xh.de is bookmarked in a lot of browsers.

And I think, we should present the new quality of CMSimple_XH by name. If we would take another name, other guys would not like that other name. Let's discuss and think about more important things :mrgreen:

Re: CMSimple is now released under GPL 3

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 4:01 pm
by leenm
Gert wrote:We have discussed some names by beginning, and the most wanted name for the baby was ..._XH. Now the domain is paid, the Google ranking is good, and I think cmsimple-xh.de is bookmarked in a lot of browsers.

And I think, we should present the new quality of CMSimle_XH by name. If we would take another name, other guys would not like that other name. Let's discuss and think about more important things :mrgreen:
Don't think I want to change the name now ;) , as I said:
leenm wrote:so I won't mind which name it is, as long as it isn't confusing for anyone. That's most important for me.
I would be confusing if we change the name.

Leen

Re: CMSimple is now released under GPL 3

Posted: Thu Jan 07, 2010 4:10 pm
by Gert
Hallo Leen, I understood right ;)

Your quoted lines are written under "And now @ all:"
myself wrote:
And now @ all:

We have discussed some names by beginning ... Let's discuss and think about more important things :mrgreen:"
I not have meant you with that ;)