Search found 120 matches
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:24 pm
- Forum: General Discussions & Announcements
- Topic: CMSimple_XH 1.6
- Replies: 71
- Views: 39743
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
I had written it in the plural too
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:00 pm
- Forum: General Discussions & Announcements
- Topic: CMSimple_XH 1.6
- Replies: 71
- Views: 39743
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
"jscripts" would be a good idea too (if I have a right in this kind of discussion). Maybe with an "howupgrade.txt" file to explain the manual deletion.
- Fri Jan 24, 2014 5:39 pm
- Forum: General Discussions & Announcements
- Topic: CMSimple_XH 1.6
- Replies: 71
- Views: 39743
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
CMSimple XH 1.6 looks fine, but I can't change my password. When I click the "Change password" button in Settings - CMS, nothing happens. Hi I have a problem which looks like that. The access to the admin on a distant server (not local) with the password "test" blocks the site. I have to erase cook...
- Wed Jan 22, 2014 9:50 pm
- Forum: General Discussions & Announcements
- Topic: CMSimple_XH 1.6
- Replies: 71
- Views: 39743
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
Thank you for your complete answer Christoph. I wanted just say that certain localized strings (title, meta markup, texts) had more their place in the content (as pagedata strings) than in the common translation file. I know that these modifications were complex and we'll do with that while waiting ...
- Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:41 am
- Forum: General Discussions & Announcements
- Topic: CMSimple_XH 1.6
- Replies: 71
- Views: 39743
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
Hi guys Another detail. IMHO the language file and that of configuration would not have being merged. The language file is valid and concerns any site with the same version (1.6.x) while the configuration (title, description, texts etc.) differs for each. It is a question of structure but it is also...
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 12:53 pm
- Forum: General Discussions & Announcements
- Topic: CMSimple_XH 1.6
- Replies: 71
- Views: 39743
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
Thx for your response Christoph.
All right with everything. My only small concerns were the relative links and the coherence in the arrangement of the contents (content/default(de)/, content/fr/, content/en/ etc.).
Deeply 2.0
All right with everything. My only small concerns were the relative links and the coherence in the arrangement of the contents (content/default(de)/, content/fr/, content/en/ etc.).
Deeply 2.0
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 9:25 am
- Forum: General Discussions & Announcements
- Topic: CMSimple_XH 1.6
- Replies: 71
- Views: 39743
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
Ok Holger! Good reasons...
However I thought that the displacement of the secondary contents was already a change important and assumed with regard to the compatibility, hence my question.
However I thought that the displacement of the secondary contents was already a change important and assumed with regard to the compatibility, hence my question.
- Fri Jan 17, 2014 8:43 am
- Forum: General Discussions & Announcements
- Topic: CMSimple_XH 1.6
- Replies: 71
- Views: 39743
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
Hello I do not know if it is a necessity but why, in XH 1.6, are not all the contents in different languages at the same level (default and the others)? It is all the same old mystery that raises problems in some relative links (i work on content with a local editor). Did I miss a explanation? :? Bob
- Thu Jan 09, 2014 6:20 pm
- Forum: General Discussions & Announcements
- Topic: CMSimple_XH 1.6
- Replies: 71
- Views: 39743
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
A great thank you for this precision. I indeed used a searching loop with page_data [' url '] which worked well but my script was heavy and slower.
I am going to modify my script in this way.
Thank you again a lot for your time!
I am going to modify my script in this way.
Thank you again a lot for your time!
- Thu Jan 09, 2014 4:48 pm
- Forum: General Discussions & Announcements
- Topic: CMSimple_XH 1.6
- Replies: 71
- Views: 39743
Re: CMSimple_XH 1.6
it seems we have to release XH 1.6.1 sooner than I had hoped. Sorry for that Christoph... Publishing dates setting is really a great improvement and it is better if it is completely functional ;-) Additionally I did not find either simple way to get back the date of edition (from a page) in the con...