Hi all,
Unfortunately, I noticed a completely wrong remark made on these sites:
https://cmsimplexh.de/?Plugins/Glossaire-v1.0.4
https://cmsimplexh.de/?Plugins/Glossaire-v2.0
https://cmsimplexh.de/?Plugins/Glossaire-v2.0.1
April 2021 – P.S. – Nachtrag zur Beachtung:
Von Glossaire werden ALLE Definitionen an die Website angehängt, nicht nur die, die auf dieser Website gebraucht werden!
Es wird also nicht ein spezifisch auf die einzelne Seite abgestimmter Content erzeugt und an die eigentliche Webseite angehängt!
Es wird vielmehr aus sämtlichen Definitionen, egal ob sie auf der betreffenden Website benötigt werden oder nicht, eine 'zusätzliche' Website erstellt und dann an die eigentliche Seite angehängt. Die Anzeige / Ausblendung wird über trickreiche CSS-Steuerung geregelt.
Das bedeutet um Fazit: Jede einzelne Seite, die aufgerufen wird, schleppt noch einen Überhang mit, der alle Definitionen umfasst.
In english :
From Glossaire, ALL definitions are attached to the website, not just those needed on this website!
Content that is specifically tailored to the individual page is not generated and attached to the actual website!
Rather, an 'additional' website is created from all definitions, regardless of whether they are required on the website in question or not, and then attached to the actual page. The display / hiding is controlled via tricky CSS control.
In summary, this means: Every single page that is called up still drags along an overhang that includes all definitions.
It's completely wrong (Do you really imagine a webmaster using a list of 400 defined words that would find all these definitions at the end of all these articles?):
Only the definitions whose words appear in the article are accumulated at the end of the latter.
This for two reasons:
- The display of definitions on mouseover (these are well part of the flow of the page which allows you to be SEO compliant).
- has the impression of the article, the words which are underlined in the text (and only these) have their definitions printed at the bottom of the article.
If no word of the article is underlined, there is no definition in the flow or in printing.
Note that it is enough to read the documentation or even only the description of the plugin to understand it.
Thank you for your attention.